Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Monday, October 31, 2011
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Monday, June 20, 2011
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Kites on the Beach
A beautiful day and windy weather meant many kites on the beach. Both on land and in the water driving folks on surfboards.
Monday, May 30, 2011
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Friday, May 27, 2011
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Monday, May 23, 2011
Sanctuary of Truth 1
This is the first of a series of photographs of the Sanctuary of Truth in Nakula, Thailand. Work began on the Sanctuary in 1981 and continues to this day with no expected date of completion.
The truth being shown in the Sanctuary is the relationship between human beings and the universe (Father, Mother, Earth, Sky, Sun, Moon and the Stars0.
The Sanctuary is made completely of wood and consists of art and from all Easter religions.
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Friday, May 6, 2011
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Saturday, April 23, 2011
storm coming
In Thailand afternoons are punctuated by strong thunderstorms. They cool the air down a bit, but just a bit and just for a short time.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Ship and Folliage
A photo from a few months back of ships at the former Naval Air Station that have been docked at the same place for a long time.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Friday, April 15, 2011
The Lorna
It's a long way from Oregon.
I'm experimenting with single shot HDR. When you have motion in the shot it's no possible to shoot three shots of the same scene as the scene is changing. In this case I shot one high quality Raw image from which I could extract the +2 and -2 reasonably well.
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Monday, April 11, 2011
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Friday, April 8, 2011
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Alameda Towne Centre at Night #2
Another night shot of the local shopping center. I like the colors in this one. Looks southwestern..
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Golden Gate and San Francisco
Sunday was too good a day to spend inside. I drove up into the hills to take this picture. It was chilly but the air was clear as it is in the spring.
Monday, April 4, 2011
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Friday, April 1, 2011
New Ways to View This Blog
Google has added a number of new ways to view blogs.
One way is http://cogiti.blogspot.com/view/snapshot#!/ and from there a drop down menu on the upper right allows you to try other views.
Very nice.. although I hope they work on a form that better shows non-square pictures.
One way is http://cogiti.blogspot.com/view/snapshot#!/ and from there a drop down menu on the upper right allows you to try other views.
Very nice.. although I hope they work on a form that better shows non-square pictures.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
On the Importance of Raw
All high end cameras and some consumer cameras offer to give you your pictures in either Raw or Jpeg format (or sometimes both). Raw format is simply the data off the sensor whereas jpeg format is the result of transforming that data into a image and compressing it in a lossy way.
The conversion from Raw to Jpeg is not trivial. A digital pictures is a rectangular grid of pixels, each pixel being an intensity value for Red, Green and Blue.
The camera's computer does all this computation very quickly. Usually it takes less than a second to create a Jpeg from the sensor values. The alternative way to create a Jpeg is to take the Raw file from the camera and run it through software provided by the camera manufacturer. For my D7000 it takes about 30 seconds to convert a Raw file to a Jpeg file. That is 30 seconds running on a very fast cpu that's many times more powerful than a camera's computer.
The question is often raised: should I shoot Jpeg or Raw?
Well, the in-camera Jpeg is produced in one second on a weak processor, and the Jpeg from the Raw will take 30 seconds to create on a very powerful machine.
Put that way which Jpeg do you think is better?
The conversion from Raw to Jpeg is not trivial. A digital pictures is a rectangular grid of pixels, each pixel being an intensity value for Red, Green and Blue.
- The camera's sensor only records the intensity of one color at each pixel location. The intensity of the other two colors must be determined from neighboring pixels.
- The camera must determine the color of the light that illuminated the scene and then transform all the color values so that white objects appear white in the Jpeg and other objects appear their correct color.
- The image must be sharpened.
The camera's computer does all this computation very quickly. Usually it takes less than a second to create a Jpeg from the sensor values. The alternative way to create a Jpeg is to take the Raw file from the camera and run it through software provided by the camera manufacturer. For my D7000 it takes about 30 seconds to convert a Raw file to a Jpeg file. That is 30 seconds running on a very fast cpu that's many times more powerful than a camera's computer.
The question is often raised: should I shoot Jpeg or Raw?
Well, the in-camera Jpeg is produced in one second on a weak processor, and the Jpeg from the Raw will take 30 seconds to create on a very powerful machine.
Put that way which Jpeg do you think is better?
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Alameda Theatre
The recently revived Alameda Theatre. It had shut down while a crummy duplex theatre existed at the shopping center. Now it's back in almost its former glory (it was turned into a multiplex as single screen theatres just can't make it these days).
Monday, March 28, 2011
AT&T and T-Mobile merger
Much has been written about proposed AT&T and T-Mobile merger. The bad part is that it will reduce competition and that means the customer will have fewer choices and the choices will not be as good. At least Verizon will remain a strong competitor.
I'm hoping for one good thing from this merger -- AT&T will finally allow SIM-unlocks for the iPhone as they do for all other phones they sell. When travelling internationally the big advantage of a GSM phone is being able to purchase a SIM card from the country where you're visiting. That gives you a local number in that country so you can make much cheaper calls (as international roaming charges are a complete ripoff). Also a local number means that local people can call you without having to dial a long distance number.
I assume that the reason that the iPhone was singled out for special treatment as regards unlocking was that AT&T felt it would lose money if a subscriber bought a subsidized phone from AT&T and then immediately quit and left AT&T. Now the early termination fee is very high and the iPhone is sold worldwide so it doesn't make financial sense to buy it from AT&T if you plan on terminating early.
I'm hoping for one good thing from this merger -- AT&T will finally allow SIM-unlocks for the iPhone as they do for all other phones they sell. When travelling internationally the big advantage of a GSM phone is being able to purchase a SIM card from the country where you're visiting. That gives you a local number in that country so you can make much cheaper calls (as international roaming charges are a complete ripoff). Also a local number means that local people can call you without having to dial a long distance number.
I assume that the reason that the iPhone was singled out for special treatment as regards unlocking was that AT&T felt it would lose money if a subscriber bought a subsidized phone from AT&T and then immediately quit and left AT&T. Now the early termination fee is very high and the iPhone is sold worldwide so it doesn't make financial sense to buy it from AT&T if you plan on terminating early.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Fruitvale Bridge #2
Another HDR photo of the Frutivale bridge. This was shot with a Nikon D-100, Nikon's first prosumer grade DSLR.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Raw material for an HDR photo
These are the three images that combined together to create the photo shown below. The numbers denote the difference in F stops between what the camera computed as the ideal exposure and the exposure used.
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Palm Trees
We were between storms and I stopped by the Grand Street marina. I was trying to get some HDR shots of the boats but it was just a little too dark to shoot the -2 stop underexposed shot without a tripod. So I took a three shot sequence of the palm trees. It turned out to be a good looking HDR photo.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Fruitvale Bridge #1
This is one of my first HDR images. This is the Fruitvale Bridge, a combination auto and railroad drawbridge. The auto drawbridge is down and the railroad drawbridge is up.
By using HDR I was able to capture the sky and reflections in the water and made them look to have the same brightness.
What is HDR and why is it important?
Imagine you go to the park on sunny day with a few puffy clouds in the sky.
The grass is a rich green and the sky a deep blue with brilliant white clouds. Sitting in the shade of a tree you see someone reading a magazine.
It's a typical scene and you can see all aspects of it at once. You take out your digital camera to make a record of this and you end up frustrated. You can take a picture of the green grass but then the sky is a washed out blue and it's hard to see who is sitting in the shade of the tree. You can photograph the sky but then the grass turns out dark and you can't even see the person in the shade of the tree. Or you can photograph the person but when the green grass looks mostly white and the sky itself is all white like a bulb.
The problem is that digital cameras can take pictures over a range of light intensities that's far less than our eyes and brain can perceive. So you have to chose which of the three parts of the beautiful park scene you want to record and that's just frustrating.
This is where High Dynamic Range photography comes in. With HDR you take a sequence of pictures with the exposure set to capture three different ranges of light intensities. You keep the camera still - you just change the exposure settings (generally just the shutter speed since aperture changes can change the focus). Then you use special software to combine the three pictures into one, using the properly exposed parts from each picture.
In our park example you might take one picture at the normal exposure determined by the camera to be suitable for this scene. Then you would overexpose the next shot by two F stops and underexpose the next shot by two F stops.
The preceding picture of the view of San Francisco from the beach was done that way. That allowed the grass near to camera to be exposed for properly as well as the sky which was much brighter than the ground, even on this cloudy day.
In subsequent posts we'll got through some examples and discuss the software.
The grass is a rich green and the sky a deep blue with brilliant white clouds. Sitting in the shade of a tree you see someone reading a magazine.
It's a typical scene and you can see all aspects of it at once. You take out your digital camera to make a record of this and you end up frustrated. You can take a picture of the green grass but then the sky is a washed out blue and it's hard to see who is sitting in the shade of the tree. You can photograph the sky but then the grass turns out dark and you can't even see the person in the shade of the tree. Or you can photograph the person but when the green grass looks mostly white and the sky itself is all white like a bulb.
The problem is that digital cameras can take pictures over a range of light intensities that's far less than our eyes and brain can perceive. So you have to chose which of the three parts of the beautiful park scene you want to record and that's just frustrating.
This is where High Dynamic Range photography comes in. With HDR you take a sequence of pictures with the exposure set to capture three different ranges of light intensities. You keep the camera still - you just change the exposure settings (generally just the shutter speed since aperture changes can change the focus). Then you use special software to combine the three pictures into one, using the properly exposed parts from each picture.
In our park example you might take one picture at the normal exposure determined by the camera to be suitable for this scene. Then you would overexpose the next shot by two F stops and underexpose the next shot by two F stops.
The preceding picture of the view of San Francisco from the beach was done that way. That allowed the grass near to camera to be exposed for properly as well as the sky which was much brighter than the ground, even on this cloudy day.
In subsequent posts we'll got through some examples and discuss the software.
Monday, March 21, 2011
A view of San Francisco taken from an Alameda beach.
This is an example of a High Dynamic Range (HDR) photograph. It's a composition of three photographs taken in sequence, each with a different exposure. I'll have more to say about HDR in a later post.
View Larger Map
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)